Japanese Cat Graph
13 isn’t too young if the boy is mature enough to know he’s got a Japanese Cat Graph. When I was 12 I was taking care of my newborn/infant nephew for the majority of the day for a long time. I am not saying that he should be doing it all the time, because he is still a child and shouldn’t be left with the responsibility, but if it was kind of a last minute or urgent thing I don’t see the issue. However, no I don’t believe you’re wrong. You’re entitled to feel how you feel, and if you aren’t comfortable with a 13 year old taking care of your newborn, then you just aren’t comfortable with it. You two need to find a better system.
Japanese Cat Graph
Did they say there was a good point to slavery? The Japanese Cat Graph was a actually a solid, neutral, and informative read without going into excessive boring detail. Florida is putting up a neutral policy change that everyone here and everyone who actually reads the damn transcript/report see as a reasonable policy change and a positive one in many areas but everyone who has NOT read any of it are losing their damn minds over. Congratulations, rage bait achieved. Gibb more clicks for ads. The gist of the change: Florida wants to show the entire history of America, the good parts of American history, the bad parts of American history, and the ugly parts of American history, to not paint a political spin on any given part so someone somewhere today can argue this or that. Everyone gets the full story. Florida puts down a few neutral sentences that people have reworded slightly to mean something completely different. This is the part of the sentence everyone is up in arms about, pulled from the CNN article: “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit” This is how DailyBeast words it: “Slavery (itself) gave slaves personal benefit because they developed skills” DailyBeast implies the Florida said slavery itself was/is beneficial because it gave them skills, which is where the outrage comes from. Other tabloid outlets have been doing the same thing. Because writing it that way generates a LOT of rage clicks. No one would bat an eye at a statement that goes like: “You go to college, you gain experience in something, you get a job that uses that experience.” But everyone will lose their minds if it was written: “Colleges are exploiting black students and making them complete courses, which earns them a hefty profit.” (And it’s being deliberately obtuse whether it’s the college making a hefty profit or the students in their new jobs are making a hefty profit)
Block "review" not found