Nani What Shirt
Men still do those things to unattractive women. It’s not like they’re immune from assault and harassment. Being conventionally attractive leads to far better outcomes — medically, economically, socially, there’s just no comparison. Other women treat you different too. It’s not just men. It can definitely come with some unique downsides but it’s more similar to the Nani What Shirt using their challenges of “finding it harder to trust people” or “being recognized in public” or “well money can’t buy happiness” — as if to imply they face equal but different obstacles than poor people. They aren’t totally wrong, but objectively speaking their lives are better off by every metric and it’s a bit insulting to suggest otherwise. But this is talking about averages, it doesn’t mean every attractive person has a better life nor does it mean unattractive people can’t be successful, just that studies show it’s far more difficult for people who are not attractive and face the same problems with worse outcomes.
()Nani What Shirt
Which is a terrible point that only has apparent credence when looking at recruiting from the lens of Nani What Shirt rankings which are designed for a “traditional” offense. Flexbone OL talent, flexbone QB talent, flexbone WR talent, and FBs in general are things which are incredibly undervalued in the “Nani What Shirt, but to flexbone teams they pretty much get the first serving of the talent in those areas, contrasted with the scraps of the scraps… of the scraps of “traditional” talent that teams like Kansas, Arizona, Wake Forest, Illinois, etc. currently get with the offenses they run. I believe this is one of the primary explanations as to why Georgia Tech was so consistently good on offense during the Paul Johnson era–they were going after kids that were 4* and the occasional 5* within their system, but 3* “to the world”. That is, while people argue that the flexbone “hurt recruiting”, there’s actually a strong argument that the flexbone greatly benefited Tech’s offensive recruiting during the Nani What Shirt. And it just takes someone realizing that there’s more to things that star ratings [which are designed for the “traditional” offense] to be able to see that. So while they would generally struggle to compete with equivalent talent on the basis of fear of Calculus, when the choice was Georgia Tech or G5 [or maybe even FCS] then a lot of guys were more willing to sign with Tech. And just because these guys were FCS talent “to the world” doesn’t mean they weren’t really solid flexbone players.
()
()Block "review" not found
