Product Description
Cats Books And Tea, Book Nerd, Cat Lover, Tea Lover, Gift For Cat Lover, Gift For Book Nerd, Gift For Tea Drinker, Animal Activist Shirt
I relate to you so much. I’m younger than you (I’m 20). I have a Cats Books And Tea, Book Nerd, Cat Lover, Tea Lover, Gift For Cat Lover, Gift For Book Nerd, Gift For Tea Drinker, Animal Activist Shirt bad lazy eye (might get surgery soon if I’m lucky). It certainly feels like it’s one thing it’ still okay to make fun of especially because we didn’t ask for it. I admit I managed to snag an attractive man but it’s only because we dated online initially and I dated him before/during his ‘glo-up’. I’ve never experienced that dating life most women do. I never will. On top of that people, men especially, are rude to me for being ugly. So many opportunities are closed to me because ugly people are associated with bad and attractive people with good. If it makes you happy to hear, I refuse to be defined by my lazy eye. I won’t avoid clothes I love because I’m ‘too ugly’ to wear it. I won’t treat myself like I don’t deserve nice things even if the Cats Books And Tea, Book Nerd, Cat Lover, Tea Lover, Gift For Cat Lover, Gift For Book Nerd, Gift For Tea Drinker, Animal Activist Shirt acts like I should. Though I will avoid eye contact still.
()Cats Books And Tea, Book Nerd, Cat Lover, Tea Lover, Gift For Cat Lover, Gift For Book Nerd, Gift For Tea Drinker, Animal Activist Shirt
The study in question is a Cats Books And Tea, Book Nerd, Cat Lover, Tea Lover, Gift For Cat Lover, Gift For Book Nerd, Gift For Tea Drinker, Animal Activist Shirt by economist David Romer. Romer found that NFL teams would be better off going for it on fourth down way less often than they should. Romer discovered that the payoffs (points scored) for going for it on fourth down even deep in your own territory are are greater than punting the ball away to your opponent, provided the distance to go is sufficiently short. Romer found that ever as far back as your own ten yard line, going for it on 4th and 3 produces the exact same likelihood of scoring points (and having points scored on you) as punting the ball away. If it’s less than that distance, a team is better off by going for it. When just outside field goal range (opponent’s 40 or so), is team is better off by going for it as far back as 4th and 8. Romer’s math checks out. But the question remains of why hasn’t anyone at the Cats Books And Tea, Book Nerd, Cat Lover, Tea Lover, Gift For Cat Lover, Gift For Book Nerd, Gift For Tea Drinker, Animal Activist Shirt of NFL level has adopted it, or really anyone at all outside of Kevin Kelley. Romer looks at the NFL so there shouldn’t be any special teams issues you describe. I have two theories as to why Romer’s theory hasn’t been adopted (in addition to commenting about coaches I’m also an economist). First is that coaching is such a tight-knit community, coaches aren’t willing to hire someone radically different (which helps explains why the same bad college and NFL assistants seem to get hired year after year). The second is loss aversion. If a new coach goes for it on fourth down on their own 10 yard line and makes it, the positive effect is not particularly strong. But if a Cats Books And Tea, Book Nerd, Cat Lover, Tea Lover, Gift For Cat Lover, Gift For Book Nerd, Gift For Tea Drinker, Animal Activist Shirt goes for it on their own 10 and doesn’t make it, fans will lose their minds.
()
()Block "review" not found
